THOMAS v. BYRD, 2:15-cv-95-DPM. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20161007734
Visitors: 22
Filed: Oct. 06, 2016
Latest Update: Oct. 06, 2016
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, Jr. , District Judge . The motion for a status conference, Ng 46, is denied without prejudice. The parties need to get together, agree on a final draft of the settlement documents, and provide those documents to the Court. For example, there doesn't seem to be common ground on who will handle claims administration. That's important. The Court also observes that the current draft notice differs from the final version of the one we all worked hard on in Covington v. By
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, Jr. , District Judge . The motion for a status conference, Ng 46, is denied without prejudice. The parties need to get together, agree on a final draft of the settlement documents, and provide those documents to the Court. For example, there doesn't seem to be common ground on who will handle claims administration. That's important. The Court also observes that the current draft notice differs from the final version of the one we all worked hard on in Covington v. Byr..
More
ORDER
D.P. MARSHALL, Jr., District Judge.
The motion for a status conference, Ng 46, is denied without prejudice. The parties need to get together, agree on a final draft of the settlement documents, and provide those documents to the Court. For example, there doesn't seem to be common ground on who will handle claims administration. That's important. The Court also observes that the current draft notice differs from the final version of the one we all worked hard on in Covington v. Byrd. The Court wonders why. The Court wishes Ms. Monaghan well in the coming days. Additional counsel for the City and Thomas (in his official capacity) should appear ASAP. The Court would appreciate a joint report on all these issues, and on anything else on the parties' minds, by 14 October 2016. We'll have a status conference thereafter if need be.
So Ordered.
Source: Leagle