STEPHENS v. KELLEY, 5:16CV00006JM/JTR. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20161007750
Visitors: 12
Filed: Oct. 06, 2016
Latest Update: Oct. 06, 2016
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, Jr. , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and the filed objections. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Judgment will be entered accordingly. I
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, Jr. , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and the filed objections. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Judgment will be entered accordingly. IT..
More
ORDER
JAMES M. MOODY, Jr., District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and the filed objections. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Judgment will be entered accordingly.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1. Petitioner Joseph L. Stephens' 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, Doc. 2, is DENIED with prejudice; and
2. A Certificate of Appealability is DENIED, see 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)-(2); Rule 11(a), Rules Governing § 2254 Cases in United States District Courts.
Source: Leagle
