PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS INSTRUCTIONS

JOE J. VOLPE, Magistrate Judge.

The following recommended disposition has been sent to Chief United States District Judge Brian S. Miller. Any party may serve and file written objections to this recommendation. Objections should be specific and should include the factual or legal basis for the objection. If the objection is to a factual finding, specifically identify that finding and the evidence that supports your objection. An original and one copy of your objections must be received in the office of the United States District Court Clerk no later than fourteen (14) days from the date of the findings and recommendations. The copy will be furnished to the opposing party. Failure to file timely objections may result in waiver of the right to appeal questions of fact.

If you are objecting to the recommendation and also desire to submit new, different, or additional evidence, and to have a hearing for this purpose before either the District Judge or Magistrate Judge, you must, at the time you file your written objections, include the following:

1. Why the record made before the Magistrate Judge is inadequate.

2. Why the evidence to be proffered at the new hearing (if such a hearing is granted) was not offered at the hearing before the Magistrate Judge.

3. The details of any testimony desired to be introduced at the new hearing in the form of an offer of proof, and a copy, or the original, of any documentary or other non-testimonial evidence desired to be introduced at the new hearing.

From this submission, the District Judge will determine the necessity for an additional evidentiary hearing. Mail your objections and "Statement of Necessity" to:

DISPOSITION

KrisAnn Williams (Plaintiff) brought this action on June 15, 2016. (Doc. No. 2.) On July 18, 2016, mail sent to Plaintiff from the Court was returned as undeliverable. (Doc. No. 12.) Upon inspection of Plaintiff's Complaint, I noticed she provided an additional address where she would be located after July 12, 2016. (Doc. No. 2 at 5.) Therefore, on July 19, 2016, I directed Plaintiff to provide an updated address and affirm her intent to continue prosecuting this action within thirty days.1 (Doc. No. 13.) Additionally, based on the returned mail, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss for failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5. (Doc. No. 15.)

More than thirty days have now passed, and Plaintiff has not complied with or otherwise responded to my Order. She was warned that such failure would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2). (Doc. No. 3 at 3.) If Plaintiff wishes to pursue this cause of action, she should so state in her objections to this Recommended Disposition and confirm the address at which she may contacted.

IT IS, THEREFORE, RECOMMENDED THAT Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 15) be GRANTED and Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. No. 2) be DISMISSED without prejudice.

SO RECOMMENDED.