Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

FOSTER v. COLEMAN, 2:17CV00016-BRW. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas Number: infdco20170509603 Visitors: 8
Filed: May 08, 2017
Latest Update: May 08, 2017
Summary: ORDER BILLY ROY WILSON , District Judge . I have reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and Plaintiff's objections. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record, I approve and adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition in their entirety. Accordingly, Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. No. 17) is GRANTED and Defendants Coleman and Jackson a
More

ORDER

I have reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and Plaintiff's objections. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record, I approve and adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition in their entirety.

Accordingly, Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. No. 17) is GRANTED and Defendants Coleman and Jackson are dismissed. Defendant Andrews is also dismissed.

Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. No. 2) is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

Dismissal of this action counts as a "strike" for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

I certify, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer