Baker v. Brown, 1:16CV00161-JM-JTR. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20171205652
Visitors: 19
Filed: Dec. 04, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 04, 2017
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, JR. , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and the filed objections. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Judgment will be entered accordingly. IT IS THEREFORE
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, JR. , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and the filed objections. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Judgment will be entered accordingly. IT IS THEREFORE ..
More
ORDER
JAMES M. MOODY, JR., District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and the filed objections. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Judgment will be entered accordingly.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1. The 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus and Amended Petition, Docs. 3 & 7, are DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE; and
2. A Certificate of Appealability is DENIED pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts.
Source: Leagle
