Chestang v. Trotter, 5:16-CV-00198 BSM. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20171219746
Visitors: 21
Filed: Dec. 18, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 18, 2017
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER , District Judge . The recommended disposition [Doc. No. 84] submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney and plaintiff Keondra Chestang's objection [Doc. No. 86] thereto have been received. After de novo review of the record, the recommended disposition is hereby adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, defendants' motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 59] is granted; Chestang's complaint against defendants is dismissed with prejudice; and Chestang's
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER , District Judge . The recommended disposition [Doc. No. 84] submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney and plaintiff Keondra Chestang's objection [Doc. No. 86] thereto have been received. After de novo review of the record, the recommended disposition is hereby adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, defendants' motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 59] is granted; Chestang's complaint against defendants is dismissed with prejudice; and Chestang's m..
More
ORDER
BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge.
The recommended disposition [Doc. No. 84] submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney and plaintiff Keondra Chestang's objection [Doc. No. 86] thereto have been received. After de novo review of the record, the recommended disposition is hereby adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, defendants' motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 59] is granted; Chestang's complaint against defendants is dismissed with prejudice; and Chestang's motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 64] is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
