Hooks v. Kelly, 5:15-cv-00266 KGB/PSH. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20180111866
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jan. 10, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 10, 2018
Summary: ORDER KRISTINE G. BAKER , District Judge . Before the Court are the Findings and Recommendation ("Recommendations") from United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris (Dkt. No. 11). Plaintiff Pamela Hooks filed objections to Judge Harris' Recommendations (Dkt. No. 12). Ms. Hooks has also filed a motion for status update (Dkt. No. 14). After review of Judge Harris' Recommendations and the timely objections, as well as a de novo review of the record, this Court adopts Judge Harris' Rec
Summary: ORDER KRISTINE G. BAKER , District Judge . Before the Court are the Findings and Recommendation ("Recommendations") from United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris (Dkt. No. 11). Plaintiff Pamela Hooks filed objections to Judge Harris' Recommendations (Dkt. No. 12). Ms. Hooks has also filed a motion for status update (Dkt. No. 14). After review of Judge Harris' Recommendations and the timely objections, as well as a de novo review of the record, this Court adopts Judge Harris' Reco..
More
ORDER
KRISTINE G. BAKER, District Judge.
Before the Court are the Findings and Recommendation ("Recommendations") from United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris (Dkt. No. 11). Plaintiff Pamela Hooks filed objections to Judge Harris' Recommendations (Dkt. No. 12). Ms. Hooks has also filed a motion for status update (Dkt. No. 14). After review of Judge Harris' Recommendations and the timely objections, as well as a de novo review of the record, this Court adopts Judge Harris' Recommendations in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects (Dkt. No. 11).
It is therefore ordered that:
1. Ms. Hook's petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed with prejudice, and the request for relief is denied (Dkt. No. 2).
2. Ms. Hook's motion for status update is denied as moot (Dkt. No. 14)
3. The Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. §2253; see also Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484-85 (2000) (articulating what a habeas applicant must show to be granted a certificate of appealability).
It is so ordered.
Source: Leagle
