Ellis v. Davis, 5:16-CV-00100 BSM. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20180131975
Visitors: 21
Filed: Jan. 30, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 30, 2018
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER , District Judge . The recommended disposition [Doc. No. 62] submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray has been received. No objections have been filed. After careful review of the record, the recommended disposition is adopted in its entirety, defendant Gordon Davis's motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 42] is granted, and plaintiff Tyrone Ellis's inadequate medical care claim against Davis is dismissed with prejudice. It is further certified that a
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER , District Judge . The recommended disposition [Doc. No. 62] submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray has been received. No objections have been filed. After careful review of the record, the recommended disposition is adopted in its entirety, defendant Gordon Davis's motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 42] is granted, and plaintiff Tyrone Ellis's inadequate medical care claim against Davis is dismissed with prejudice. It is further certified that an..
More
ORDER
BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge.
The recommended disposition [Doc. No. 62] submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray has been received. No objections have been filed. After careful review of the record, the recommended disposition is adopted in its entirety, defendant Gordon Davis's motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 42] is granted, and plaintiff Tyrone Ellis's inadequate medical care claim against Davis is dismissed with prejudice. It is further certified that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order and judgment would not be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
