Filed: Feb. 06, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 06, 2018
Summary: JUDGMENT J. LEON HOLMES , District Judge . On the 5th day of February, 2018, this action came before the Court for a bench trial. The plaintiff, John Mark McLendon, a/k/a Sidney McLendon 1 , appeared in person and with his lawyers, Joshua Sanford and Stephen Rauls. Schlumberger Technology Corporation appeared through its corporate representative, Preston Ziola, and its lawyers, Kelly D. Reese and Robert P. Lombardi. Both parties announced ready for trial. At the conclusion of all of the ev
Summary: JUDGMENT J. LEON HOLMES , District Judge . On the 5th day of February, 2018, this action came before the Court for a bench trial. The plaintiff, John Mark McLendon, a/k/a Sidney McLendon 1 , appeared in person and with his lawyers, Joshua Sanford and Stephen Rauls. Schlumberger Technology Corporation appeared through its corporate representative, Preston Ziola, and its lawyers, Kelly D. Reese and Robert P. Lombardi. Both parties announced ready for trial. At the conclusion of all of the evi..
More
JUDGMENT
J. LEON HOLMES, District Judge.
On the 5th day of February, 2018, this action came before the Court for a bench trial. The plaintiff, John Mark McLendon, a/k/a Sidney McLendon1, appeared in person and with his lawyers, Joshua Sanford and Stephen Rauls. Schlumberger Technology Corporation appeared through its corporate representative, Preston Ziola, and its lawyers, Kelly D. Reese and Robert P. Lombardi. Both parties announced ready for trial. At the conclusion of all of the evidence, the Court made findings of fact and conclusions of law from the bench and on the record. Based on those findings of fact and conclusions of law, judgment is entered in favor of Schlumberger Technology Corporation on the claims of John Mark McLendon, a/k/a Sidney McLendon. The complaint of John Mark McLendon, a/k/a Sidney McLendon, is dismissed with prejudice.
