Richardson v. Kelley, 5:16-CV-00245 BSM. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20180215848
Visitors: 32
Filed: Feb. 14, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 14, 2018
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER , District Judge . The proposed findings and recommendation submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris [Doc. No. 96] and plaintiff Every Richardson's objections [Doc. No. 97] have been reviewed. After de novo review of the record, the proposed findings and recommendation are adopted in their entirety. Accordingly, Richardson's complaint is dismissed with prejudice, his motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 81] is denied, defendants' motion for su
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER , District Judge . The proposed findings and recommendation submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris [Doc. No. 96] and plaintiff Every Richardson's objections [Doc. No. 97] have been reviewed. After de novo review of the record, the proposed findings and recommendation are adopted in their entirety. Accordingly, Richardson's complaint is dismissed with prejudice, his motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 81] is denied, defendants' motion for sum..
More
ORDER
BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge.
The proposed findings and recommendation submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris [Doc. No. 96] and plaintiff Every Richardson's objections [Doc. No. 97] have been reviewed. After de novo review of the record, the proposed findings and recommendation are adopted in their entirety. Accordingly, Richardson's complaint is dismissed with prejudice, his motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 81] is denied, defendants' motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 87] is granted, and the case is dismissed with prejudice. It is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
