Centennial Bank v. Wood, 3:17-cv-226-DPM. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20180313560
Visitors: 20
Filed: Mar. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 12, 2018
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, JR. , District Judge . The Court grants the motion to clarify, No. 69, its hearing Order, No. 65. The March 16th hearing is for a one-hour argument on the pending motions, not for evidence. No party may call witnesses. The Court believes it has all material papers. If a party intends to argue from a paper not already in the record, then it must provide a copy to opposing counsel and the Court by 14 March 2018. The Court directed Baker and Wood to attend primarily so
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, JR. , District Judge . The Court grants the motion to clarify, No. 69, its hearing Order, No. 65. The March 16th hearing is for a one-hour argument on the pending motions, not for evidence. No party may call witnesses. The Court believes it has all material papers. If a party intends to argue from a paper not already in the record, then it must provide a copy to opposing counsel and the Court by 14 March 2018. The Court directed Baker and Wood to attend primarily so ..
More
ORDER
D.P. MARSHALL, JR., District Judge.
The Court grants the motion to clarify, No. 69, its hearing Order, No. 65. The March 16th hearing is for a one-hour argument on the pending motions, not for evidence. No party may call witnesses. The Court believes it has all material papers. If a party intends to argue from a paper not already in the record, then it must provide a copy to opposing counsel and the Court by 14 March 2018. The Court directed Baker and Wood to attend primarily so they could consult with, and assist, their lawyers. It is possible, though unlikely, that the Court will put one or both of them under oath to clarify some important fact. Except for that possibility, and any timely disclosed new exhibits, there will be no evidence received at the March 16th hearing.
So Ordered.
Source: Leagle
