Stokes v. RPM Commerical Inc., 4:17-cv-00425 KGB. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20180313571
Visitors: 10
Filed: Mar. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 12, 2018
Summary: ORDER KRISTINE G. BAKER , District Judge . Before the Court is plaintiffs Kenneth and Mary Stokes' motion to extend deadline to respond (Dkt. No. 25). By prior Order, this Court granted Mr. and Mrs. Stokes' motion to extend the deadline to respond to separate defendants RPM Commercial, Inc. d/b/a Coldwell Banker Commercial, RPM, and Rector Phillips Morse, Inc. d/b/a RPM Group's (collectively, "RPM Defendants") motion for judgment on the pleadings and to dismiss for lack of standing (Dkt. N
Summary: ORDER KRISTINE G. BAKER , District Judge . Before the Court is plaintiffs Kenneth and Mary Stokes' motion to extend deadline to respond (Dkt. No. 25). By prior Order, this Court granted Mr. and Mrs. Stokes' motion to extend the deadline to respond to separate defendants RPM Commercial, Inc. d/b/a Coldwell Banker Commercial, RPM, and Rector Phillips Morse, Inc. d/b/a RPM Group's (collectively, "RPM Defendants") motion for judgment on the pleadings and to dismiss for lack of standing (Dkt. No..
More
ORDER
KRISTINE G. BAKER, District Judge.
Before the Court is plaintiffs Kenneth and Mary Stokes' motion to extend deadline to respond (Dkt. No. 25). By prior Order, this Court granted Mr. and Mrs. Stokes' motion to extend the deadline to respond to separate defendants RPM Commercial, Inc. d/b/a Coldwell Banker Commercial, RPM, and Rector Phillips Morse, Inc. d/b/a RPM Group's (collectively, "RPM Defendants") motion for judgment on the pleadings and to dismiss for lack of standing (Dkt. No. 24). The Court granted Mr. and Mrs. Stokes up to and including March 9, 2018, to respond (Id.). In their present motion, Mr. and Mrs. Stokes submit that they are working through settlement negotiations and are close to settling (Dkt. No. 25, ¶ 3). They further assert that they have conferred with opposing counsel and that opposing counsel has no objection to the extension (Id., ¶ 5).
For good cause shown, the Court grants the motion (Dkt. No. 25). Mr. and Mrs. Stokes have up to and including March 23, 2018, to respond to the RPM Defendants' motion
So ordered.
Source: Leagle
