Childers v. Kelley, 5:17-CV-00267-JLH-JTR. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20180329906
Visitors: 7
Filed: Mar. 28, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2018
Summary: ORDER J. LEON HOLMES , District Judge . The proposed findings and recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray have been reviewed. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the proposed findings and recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Respondent's motion to dismiss [ Doc. No. 6 ] is granted, and the petition for wri
Summary: ORDER J. LEON HOLMES , District Judge . The proposed findings and recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray have been reviewed. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the proposed findings and recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Respondent's motion to dismiss [ Doc. No. 6 ] is granted, and the petition for writ..
More
ORDER
J. LEON HOLMES, District Judge.
The proposed findings and recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray have been reviewed. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the proposed findings and recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.
Respondent's motion to dismiss [Doc. No. 6] is granted, and the petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 [Doc. No. 2] filed by Anna Childers is dismissed with prejudice. In § 2254 cases, a certificate of appealability may issue only if the petitioner has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)-(2). As there is no issue on which Childers has made a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
