Law v. Rohder, 1:17-cv-00083-KGB-JJV. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20180516a57
Visitors: 5
Filed: May 15, 2018
Latest Update: May 15, 2018
Summary: ORDER KRISTINE G. BAKER , District Judge . Before the Court are Proposed Findings and Recommendations filed by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe (Dkt. No. 5). No objections to the Proposed Findings and Recommendations have been filed, and the time for filing objections has passed. After review, this Court adopts the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Plaintiff Harold M. Law's claims against defendants Karen Elaine Pay
Summary: ORDER KRISTINE G. BAKER , District Judge . Before the Court are Proposed Findings and Recommendations filed by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe (Dkt. No. 5). No objections to the Proposed Findings and Recommendations have been filed, and the time for filing objections has passed. After review, this Court adopts the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Plaintiff Harold M. Law's claims against defendants Karen Elaine Payn..
More
ORDER
KRISTINE G. BAKER, District Judge.
Before the Court are Proposed Findings and Recommendations filed by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe (Dkt. No. 5). No objections to the Proposed Findings and Recommendations have been filed, and the time for filing objections has passed. After review, this Court adopts the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Plaintiff Harold M. Law's claims against defendants Karen Elaine Payne, M. Hall, and Ray Griffen are dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a viable claim against them.
Also before the Court are additional Proposed Findings and Recommendations filed by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe (Dkt. No. 19). No objections to the additional Proposed Findings and Recommendations have been filed, and the time for filing objections has passed. After review, this Court adopts the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Mr. Law's complaint is hereby dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute (Dkt. Nos. 2, 4). The Court certifies that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.
So ordered.
Source: Leagle
