Filed: May 18, 2018
Latest Update: May 18, 2018
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, JR. , District Judge . The Court construes the new motion, N o 182, as a request for clarification from ARC and Dr. Robinson, and grants it. As the Court said last week, cash from ARC will be fine. N o 173 at 1. So there can be no misunderstanding: Yes, ARC may deposit the cash with the Clerk. ARC is obligated to post $12,500, not the whole $25,000. Though a joint posting with CSCB is what the Court contemplated originally, N o 137 at 11, it was cle
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, JR. , District Judge . The Court construes the new motion, N o 182, as a request for clarification from ARC and Dr. Robinson, and grants it. As the Court said last week, cash from ARC will be fine. N o 173 at 1. So there can be no misunderstanding: Yes, ARC may deposit the cash with the Clerk. ARC is obligated to post $12,500, not the whole $25,000. Though a joint posting with CSCB is what the Court contemplated originally, N o 137 at 11, it was clea..
More
ORDER
D.P. MARSHALL, JR., District Judge.
The Court construes the new motion, No 182, as a request for clarification from ARC and Dr. Robinson, and grants it. As the Court said last week, cash from ARC will be fine. No 173 at 1. So there can be no misunderstanding: Yes, ARC may deposit the cash with the Clerk. ARC is obligated to post $12,500, not the whole $25,000. Though a joint posting with CSCB is what the Court contemplated originally, No 137 at 11, it was clear by late April, when CSCB's ATV proposal came in, No 165, that the parties were proceeding separately on the security. OK. What's not OK is foot dragging. Calendaring error noted. We all make them. The extended deadline was May 15th, and today is May 18th.
So Ordered.
