Cotton v. M-Tech International, Inc., 4:17CV00456 JLH. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20180524892
Visitors: 3
Filed: May 23, 2018
Latest Update: May 23, 2018
Summary: ORDER J. LEON HOLMES , District Judge . The parties have filed a joint motion to approve settlement agreement and have submitted the settlement agreement in camera for the Court to review. Having reviewed the settlement agreement, the Court finds that it is fair and reasonable, that it appears to have been the result of an arms' length negotiation in which Amanda Cotton was represented by competent counsel, and that it represents adequate compensation to Cotton in light of the potential
Summary: ORDER J. LEON HOLMES , District Judge . The parties have filed a joint motion to approve settlement agreement and have submitted the settlement agreement in camera for the Court to review. Having reviewed the settlement agreement, the Court finds that it is fair and reasonable, that it appears to have been the result of an arms' length negotiation in which Amanda Cotton was represented by competent counsel, and that it represents adequate compensation to Cotton in light of the potential r..
More
ORDER
J. LEON HOLMES, District Judge.
The parties have filed a joint motion to approve settlement agreement and have submitted the settlement agreement in camera for the Court to review. Having reviewed the settlement agreement, the Court finds that it is fair and reasonable, that it appears to have been the result of an arms' length negotiation in which Amanda Cotton was represented by competent counsel, and that it represents adequate compensation to Cotton in light of the potential risks of litigation. The joint motion to approve settlement is therefore GRANTED. Document #14. This action is hereby dismissed with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
