Hall v. Budnik, 5:17CV00318-JM-JTK. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20180606919
Visitors: 16
Filed: Jun. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 05, 2018
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, JR. , District Judge . The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 31) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's Complaint is
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, JR. , District Judge . The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 31) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's Complaint is D..
More
ORDER
JAMES M. MOODY, JR., District Judge.
The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 31) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice.
An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Order.
Source: Leagle
