Filed: Jul. 18, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 18, 2018
Summary: FINAL JUDGMENT J. LEON HOLMES , District Judge . The Court previously dismissed the counterclaim of Crane USA Inc. The parties have now stipulated to the dismissal of Counts I, II, and IV in the complaint of Essick Air Products, Inc., leaving only Count III, which sought a declaration of no trade dress infringement, as the only claim that has not been dismissed. Pursuant to the Opinion and Order entered on July 12, 2018, judgment is entered in favor of Essick Air Products, Inc., against Cr
Summary: FINAL JUDGMENT J. LEON HOLMES , District Judge . The Court previously dismissed the counterclaim of Crane USA Inc. The parties have now stipulated to the dismissal of Counts I, II, and IV in the complaint of Essick Air Products, Inc., leaving only Count III, which sought a declaration of no trade dress infringement, as the only claim that has not been dismissed. Pursuant to the Opinion and Order entered on July 12, 2018, judgment is entered in favor of Essick Air Products, Inc., against Cra..
More
FINAL JUDGMENT
J. LEON HOLMES, District Judge.
The Court previously dismissed the counterclaim of Crane USA Inc. The parties have now stipulated to the dismissal of Counts I, II, and IV in the complaint of Essick Air Products, Inc., leaving only Count III, which sought a declaration of no trade dress infringement, as the only claim that has not been dismissed. Pursuant to the Opinion and Order entered on July 12, 2018, judgment is entered in favor of Essick Air Products, Inc., against Crane USA Inc., on Count III in the complaint of Essick Air Products, Inc.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
