Dunahue v. Knott, 2:18CV00021-JM-JTK. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20180723588
Visitors: 8
Filed: Jul. 20, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 20, 2018
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, JR. , District Judge . The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief (Doc. No. 46) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, JR. , District Judge . The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief (Doc. No. 46) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED...
More
ORDER
JAMES M. MOODY, JR., District Judge.
The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief (Doc. No. 46) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
