Prevost v. Westbrook, 2:17-cv-00144-KGB/JJV. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20180905556
Visitors: 14
Filed: Sep. 04, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 04, 2018
Summary: ORDER KRISTINE G. BAKER , District Judge . The Court has received Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe (Dkt. No. 20). No objections have been filed, and the time for filing objections has passed. The Court adopts the Proposed Findings and Recommendations as its findings in all respects, except to the extent it recommends the dismissal of separate defendants Valorie Westbrook and Jeremy Andrews, as those two defendants have subsequen
Summary: ORDER KRISTINE G. BAKER , District Judge . The Court has received Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe (Dkt. No. 20). No objections have been filed, and the time for filing objections has passed. The Court adopts the Proposed Findings and Recommendations as its findings in all respects, except to the extent it recommends the dismissal of separate defendants Valorie Westbrook and Jeremy Andrews, as those two defendants have subsequent..
More
ORDER
KRISTINE G. BAKER, District Judge.
The Court has received Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe (Dkt. No. 20). No objections have been filed, and the time for filing objections has passed. The Court adopts the Proposed Findings and Recommendations as its findings in all respects, except to the extent it recommends the dismissal of separate defendants Valorie Westbrook and Jeremy Andrews, as those two defendants have subsequently been dismissed as defendants from this lawsuit based on the motion filed by plaintiff John E. Prevost, II (see Dkt. Nos. 25, 26). Accordingly, the Court grants defendants' motion for partial summary judgment consistent with the terms of this Order (Dkt. No. 16) and denies Mr. Prevost's cross motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 19). The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that in in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.
So ordered.
Source: Leagle