Filed: Sep. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 13, 2018
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, JR. , District Judge . 1. Yesterday the Clerk received $2,000 from CSCB Rehabilitation Management Group, LLC, for the imposed fine, N o. 208. Copy of the check and receipt attached. Motion to continue, N o. 214, granted as modified. The show cause Order, N o. 211, is discharged-without prejudice to the Court considering CSCB's delayed payment of the fine in due course if CSCB fails to comply with another Court order. 2. Second joint status report o
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, JR. , District Judge . 1. Yesterday the Clerk received $2,000 from CSCB Rehabilitation Management Group, LLC, for the imposed fine, N o. 208. Copy of the check and receipt attached. Motion to continue, N o. 214, granted as modified. The show cause Order, N o. 211, is discharged-without prejudice to the Court considering CSCB's delayed payment of the fine in due course if CSCB fails to comply with another Court order. 2. Second joint status report on..
More
ORDER
D.P. MARSHALL, JR., District Judge.
1. Yesterday the Clerk received $2,000 from CSCB Rehabilitation Management Group, LLC, for the imposed fine, No. 208. Copy of the check and receipt attached. Motion to continue, No. 214, granted as modified. The show cause Order, No. 211, is discharged-without prejudice to the Court considering CSCB's delayed payment of the fine in due course if CSCB fails to comply with another Court order.
2. Second joint status report on discovery disputes, No. 213, noted. The Court commends counsels' in-person meetings to resolve disputes. The parties should re-double their efforts to compromise on any lingering matters. The Court sets 28 September 2018 as the deadline for filing a detailed report of any remaining discovery disputes. Counsel should plan now: the 30 November 2018 discovery deadline will not be extended; and the Amended Final Scheduling Order, No.167, in this older case will not be amended again absent truly extraordinary circumstances. What this Court said in March is even more true today-the parties' dispute needs adjudication, not delay. No.137 at 15.
So Ordered.
