Filed: Oct. 16, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 16, 2018
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, JR. , District Judge . For the reasons stated at the end of the telephone hearing, the motion to quash, No 158, is denied, and the motion for a protective order, No 160, is partly granted and partly denied: the production on each subpoena is substantially narrowed as specified. And the Smith production and deposition are sealed. A definitive ruling on the Smith-related privilege issues is reserved pending the Court's review (if necessary) on what is asked, answered,
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, JR. , District Judge . For the reasons stated at the end of the telephone hearing, the motion to quash, No 158, is denied, and the motion for a protective order, No 160, is partly granted and partly denied: the production on each subpoena is substantially narrowed as specified. And the Smith production and deposition are sealed. A definitive ruling on the Smith-related privilege issues is reserved pending the Court's review (if necessary) on what is asked, answered, ..
More
ORDER
D.P. MARSHALL, JR., District Judge.
For the reasons stated at the end of the telephone hearing, the motion to quash, No 158, is denied, and the motion for a protective order, No 160, is partly granted and partly denied: the production on each subpoena is substantially narrowed as specified. And the Smith production and deposition are sealed. A definitive ruling on the Smith-related privilege issues is reserved pending the Court's review (if necessary) on what is asked, answered, and produced. Joint report on any such privilege dispute due by 16 November 2018.
So Ordered.
