Duncan v. Lay, 5:17-cv-00311 JM-PSH. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20181102c08
Visitors: 25
Filed: Oct. 31, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 31, 2018
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, JR. , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris, and the objections filed. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, JR. , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris, and the objections filed. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in a..
More
ORDER
JAMES M. MOODY, JR., District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris, and the objections filed. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is granted, and Duncan's claims against defendants Kelley, Lay, and McDonell are dismissed without prejudice due to Duncan's failure to exhaust his administrative remedies as to these defendants. Duncan's claims against defendant Johnson will remain.
Source: Leagle