Perkins v. Atwood, 4:17-CV-00683 BSM-PSH. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20181102g58
Visitors: 10
Filed: Nov. 01, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 01, 2018
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER , District Judge . The recommended partial disposition [Doc. No. 37] submitted by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray has been received. No objections were filed. After careful review of the record, the recommended partial disposition is adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, Perkins's motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 25] is denied. It is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3). IT IS
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER , District Judge . The recommended partial disposition [Doc. No. 37] submitted by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray has been received. No objections were filed. After careful review of the record, the recommended partial disposition is adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, Perkins's motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 25] is denied. It is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3). IT IS S..
More
ORDER
BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge.
The recommended partial disposition [Doc. No. 37] submitted by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray has been received. No objections were filed. After careful review of the record, the recommended partial disposition is adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, Perkins's motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 25] is denied. It is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
