Briley v. Taylor, 5:17CV00275-JM. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20181129906
Visitors: 6
Filed: Nov. 28, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 28, 2018
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, JR. , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and Plaintiff's Objections. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record including the video evidence, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all r
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, JR. , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and Plaintiff's Objections. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record including the video evidence, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all re..
More
ORDER
JAMES M. MOODY, JR., District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and Plaintiff's Objections. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record including the video evidence, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
1. Defendant Taylor's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 35) is GRANTED.
2. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Taylor are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
3. Plaintiff's cause of action is DISMISSED.
4. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order adopting the recommendations and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith.
Source: Leagle
