Berry v. Doss, 3:15-CV-378-BSM-BD. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20181130824
Visitors: 15
Filed: Nov. 29, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 29, 2018
Summary: ORDER BETH DEERE , Magistrate Judge . Defendants' interlocutory appeal has been dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. (Docket entries #64, #67) The parties have not consented to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, a jury trial setting on the docket of Chief Judge Brian S. Miller is now appropriate on Mr. Berry's failure-to-protect claims for money damages against Defendants Brian Doss, Carol McFarlin, and Karen Hardesty 1 in their individual capacities. FootNotes 1. T
Summary: ORDER BETH DEERE , Magistrate Judge . Defendants' interlocutory appeal has been dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. (Docket entries #64, #67) The parties have not consented to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, a jury trial setting on the docket of Chief Judge Brian S. Miller is now appropriate on Mr. Berry's failure-to-protect claims for money damages against Defendants Brian Doss, Carol McFarlin, and Karen Hardesty 1 in their individual capacities. FootNotes 1. Th..
More
ORDER
BETH DEERE, Magistrate Judge.
Defendants' interlocutory appeal has been dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. (Docket entries #64, #67) The parties have not consented to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, a jury trial setting on the docket of Chief Judge Brian S. Miller is now appropriate on Mr. Berry's failure-to-protect claims for money damages against Defendants Brian Doss, Carol McFarlin, and Karen Hardesty1 in their individual capacities.
FootNotes
1. The Clerk is directed to update the docket sheet to indicate the full name of Defendant Karen Hardesty as indicated in her pleadings.
Source: Leagle
