Williams v. Roselle Hospitality, Inc., 3:18-cv-00070-KGB. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20190107412
Visitors: 8
Filed: Jan. 04, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 04, 2019
Summary: ORDER KRISTINE G. BAKER , District Judge . Before the Court is a joint stipulation of dismissal with prejudice filed by plaintiff Edward Williams and defendant Roselle Hospitality, Inc. (Dkt. No. 10). The parties represent that they have entered into a settlement agreement and that all parties shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs ( Id. ). The parties request that this Court retain jurisdiction for purposes of enforcing the settlement agreement entered into between the parties ( Id
Summary: ORDER KRISTINE G. BAKER , District Judge . Before the Court is a joint stipulation of dismissal with prejudice filed by plaintiff Edward Williams and defendant Roselle Hospitality, Inc. (Dkt. No. 10). The parties represent that they have entered into a settlement agreement and that all parties shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs ( Id. ). The parties request that this Court retain jurisdiction for purposes of enforcing the settlement agreement entered into between the parties ( Id...
More
ORDER
KRISTINE G. BAKER, District Judge.
Before the Court is a joint stipulation of dismissal with prejudice filed by plaintiff Edward Williams and defendant Roselle Hospitality, Inc. (Dkt. No. 10). The parties represent that they have entered into a settlement agreement and that all parties shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs (Id.). The parties request that this Court retain jurisdiction for purposes of enforcing the settlement agreement entered into between the parties (Id.). The joint stipulation accords with the terms of Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For good cause shown, the Court adopts the joint stipulation of dismissal with prejudice (Dkt. No. 10). The action is dismissed with prejudice, with the Court retaining jurisdiction for purposes of enforcing the settlement agreement entered into between the parties.
So ordered.
Source: Leagle
