Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Centennial Bank v. Wood, 3:17-cv-226-DPM (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas Number: infdco20190304494 Visitors: 19
Filed: Feb. 28, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 28, 2019
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, JR. , District Judge . The Court consolidated these cases after removal, directing that all future filings would be in the lead case, No. 3:17-cv-226-DPM. N o 20. The Court recently filed its Judgment on Centennial Bank's second amended complaint. This Judgment resolved the issues originally in No. 3:17-cv-226-DPM, subject to the Court's continuing jurisdiction on trust administration and collateral issues, but not the issues in No. 3:17-cv-227-DPM, which concern
More

ORDER

The Court consolidated these cases after removal, directing that all future filings would be in the lead case, No. 3:17-cv-226-DPM. No 20. The Court recently filed its Judgment on Centennial Bank's second amended complaint. This Judgment resolved the issues originally in No. 3:17-cv-226-DPM, subject to the Court's continuing jurisdiction on trust administration and collateral issues, but not the issues in No. 3:17-cv-227-DPM, which concern the guardianship of Mrs. Stiny's estate and the guardianship of her person. The Clerk filed the Judgment in both cases pursuant to standard practice. Though consolidated, the cases remain separate, at least for purposes of entering judgment and appellate rights. Hall v. Hall, 138 S.Ct. 1118, 1130-31 (2018). The Court therefore vacates the Judgment, No 43, in case No. 3:17-cv-227-DPM. The Judgment, NQ 295, in case No. 3:17-cv-226-DPM, remains in place.

So Ordered.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer