Sullivan v. Kelley, 5:17-CV-000147-JLH/JTR. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20190305630
Visitors: 12
Filed: Mar. 04, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 04, 2019
Summary: ORDER J. LEON HOLMES , District Judge . The proposed findings and recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray have been reviewed, along with the filed response (Doc. #35). After careful consideration and a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the proposed findings and recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. The petition for writ o
Summary: ORDER J. LEON HOLMES , District Judge . The proposed findings and recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray have been reviewed, along with the filed response (Doc. #35). After careful consideration and a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the proposed findings and recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. The petition for writ of..
More
ORDER
J. LEON HOLMES, District Judge.
The proposed findings and recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray have been reviewed, along with the filed response (Doc. #35). After careful consideration and a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the proposed findings and recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 filed by George T. Sullivan is dismissed with prejudice. Doc. #2. In § 2254 cases, a certificate of appealability may issue only if the petitioner has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)-(2). As there is no issue on which Sullivan has made a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
