Esau v. Mapco Express, Inc., 4:19-cv-91-DPM. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20190313696
Visitors: 29
Filed: Mar. 12, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 12, 2019
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, JR. , District Judge . The Court appreciates Esau's response to the Court's questions. No. 9. Her motion to remand, No. 6, is granted based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction. There's no diversity jurisdiction: Esau stipulates that she will neither seek nor accept a total recovery exceeding $75,000 (including attorney's fees, but excluding interest and costs). And she isn't claiming that Mapco violated federal law. This case is remanded to the Circuit Court of P
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, JR. , District Judge . The Court appreciates Esau's response to the Court's questions. No. 9. Her motion to remand, No. 6, is granted based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction. There's no diversity jurisdiction: Esau stipulates that she will neither seek nor accept a total recovery exceeding $75,000 (including attorney's fees, but excluding interest and costs). And she isn't claiming that Mapco violated federal law. This case is remanded to the Circuit Court of Pu..
More
ORDER
D.P. MARSHALL, JR., District Judge.
The Court appreciates Esau's response to the Court's questions. No. 9. Her motion to remand, No. 6, is granted based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction. There's no diversity jurisdiction: Esau stipulates that she will neither seek nor accept a total recovery exceeding $75,000 (including attorney's fees, but excluding interest and costs). And she isn't claiming that Mapco violated federal law. This case is remanded to the Circuit Court of Pulaski County, Arkansas.
So Ordered.
Source: Leagle
