Ezell v. Watson, 4:18CV00396-BRW-JTK. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20190402895
Visitors: 12
Filed: Apr. 01, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 01, 2019
Summary: ORDER BILLY ROY WILSON , District Judge . I have received proposed findings and recommendations (Doc. No. 74) from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. There have been no objections. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, I adopt them in their entirety. Accordingly, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 64) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. It is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Allen, Brawley and Sylveste
Summary: ORDER BILLY ROY WILSON , District Judge . I have received proposed findings and recommendations (Doc. No. 74) from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. There have been no objections. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, I adopt them in their entirety. Accordingly, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 64) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. It is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Allen, Brawley and Sylvester..
More
ORDER
BILLY ROY WILSON, District Judge.
I have received proposed findings and recommendations (Doc. No. 74) from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. There have been no objections. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, I adopt them in their entirety.
Accordingly, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 64) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. It is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Allen, Brawley and Sylvester and his official capacity claim against Defendant Watson. The motion is DENIED with respect to Plaintiff's individual capacity excessive force claim against Defendant Watson.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
