Crockett v. Kelley, 5:18-cv-00210-JM. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20190415c90
Visitors: 4
Filed: Apr. 12, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 12, 2019
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, JR. , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and the filed objections. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. The 28 U.S.C. 225
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, JR. , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and the filed objections. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. The 28 U.S.C. 2254..
More
ORDER
JAMES M. MOODY, JR., District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and the filed objections. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1. The 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, Doc. 1, is DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE; and
2. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an in forma pauperis appeal of this Order and accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith.
Source: Leagle
