Dillon v. Maxus Properties, Inc., 4:17CV00813 JLH. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20190419g43
Visitors: 9
Filed: Apr. 18, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 18, 2019
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL J. LEON HOLMES , District Judge . Having been notified that a settlement has been reached in this matter, the Court finds that this case should be dismissed. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the complaint and all claims in this action against defendants be, and they are, hereby dismissed with prejudice. The Court retains complete jurisdiction for thirty (30) days to vacate this order and to reopen the action if it is satisfactorily shown that settlement has not been comple
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL J. LEON HOLMES , District Judge . Having been notified that a settlement has been reached in this matter, the Court finds that this case should be dismissed. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the complaint and all claims in this action against defendants be, and they are, hereby dismissed with prejudice. The Court retains complete jurisdiction for thirty (30) days to vacate this order and to reopen the action if it is satisfactorily shown that settlement has not been complet..
More
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
J. LEON HOLMES, District Judge.
Having been notified that a settlement has been reached in this matter, the Court finds that this case should be dismissed.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the complaint and all claims in this action against defendants be, and they are, hereby dismissed with prejudice.
The Court retains complete jurisdiction for thirty (30) days to vacate this order and to reopen the action if it is satisfactorily shown that settlement has not been completed and further litigation is necessary.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
