Nelson v. U.S., 2:18CV00080-JM-JTK. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20190423793
Visitors: 31
Filed: Apr. 22, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 22, 2019
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, JR. , District Judge . The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. There have been no objections. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. The Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Gotreaux, Rivera, and Tindel (Doc. No. 76) is GRANTED, and these Defendants are DISMISSED withou
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, JR. , District Judge . The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. There have been no objections. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. The Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Gotreaux, Rivera, and Tindel (Doc. No. 76) is GRANTED, and these Defendants are DISMISSED without..
More
ORDER
JAMES M. MOODY, JR., District Judge.
The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. There have been no objections. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
1. The Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Gotreaux, Rivera, and Tindel (Doc. No. 76) is GRANTED, and these Defendants are DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies.
2. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED.
An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
