Stricklin v. Stark, 5:18-CV-00224 BSM. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20190619798
Visitors: 14
Filed: Jun. 18, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 18, 2019
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER , District Judge . After careful review of the record, the recommended disposition [Doc. No. 31] submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Beth Deere is adopted. Accordingly, defendants' motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 27] is granted, and this case is dismissed. The claims regarding Joshua Stricklin's assignment to punitive isolation are dismissed with prejudice, and the claims regarding the failure to receive a 48-hour relief period after serving 30 days in p
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER , District Judge . After careful review of the record, the recommended disposition [Doc. No. 31] submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Beth Deere is adopted. Accordingly, defendants' motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 27] is granted, and this case is dismissed. The claims regarding Joshua Stricklin's assignment to punitive isolation are dismissed with prejudice, and the claims regarding the failure to receive a 48-hour relief period after serving 30 days in pu..
More
ORDER
BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge.
After careful review of the record, the recommended disposition [Doc. No. 31] submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Beth Deere is adopted. Accordingly, defendants' motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 27] is granted, and this case is dismissed. The claims regarding Joshua Stricklin's assignment to punitive isolation are dismissed with prejudice, and the claims regarding the failure to receive a 48-hour relief period after serving 30 days in punitive isolation are dismissed without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
