Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Earwood v. Kelley, 3:19-cv-47-DPM. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas Number: infdco20190711748 Visitors: 11
Filed: Jul. 10, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 10, 2019
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, JR. , District Judge . The Court ordered service on Kelley and Burns; and they have answered the complaint. No 4 & No 9. If Earwood wants to proceed with his claims against the Doe Defendants, then he must identify them and provide an address for service by 9 August 2019. FED. R. CIV. P. 4(m); Lee v. Armantrout, 991 F.2d 487 , 489 (8th Cir. 1993). If he doesn't, then his claims against them will be dismissed without prejudice. LOCAL RULE 5.5(c)(2). So Ordered. Fo
More

ORDER

The Court ordered service on Kelley and Burns; and they have answered the complaint. No 4 & No 9. If Earwood wants to proceed with his claims against the Doe Defendants, then he must identify them and provide an address for service by 9 August 2019. FED. R. CIV. P. 4(m); Lee v. Armantrout, 991 F.2d 487, 489 (8th Cir. 1993). If he doesn't, then his claims against them will be dismissed without prejudice. LOCAL RULE 5.5(c)(2).

So Ordered.

FootNotes


* The Court directs the Clerk to correct the spelling of Burns's name on the docket. No 9.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer