Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Edgerson, 4:15-CR-00240-01 BSM. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas Number: infdco20190711751 Visitors: 4
Filed: Jul. 10, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 10, 2019
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER , District Judge . James Ivory Edgerson's motion for relief from the judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 2255 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6) [Doc. No. 213] is denied. Edgerson requests redaction of any information from his presentence investigation report ("PSR") that might prevent him from participating in the Bureau of Prison's residential drug treatment program and receiving time credits towards his sentence. His motion is denied because it is not
More

ORDER

James Ivory Edgerson's motion for relief from the judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 2255 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6) [Doc. No. 213] is denied.

Edgerson requests redaction of any information from his presentence investigation report ("PSR") that might prevent him from participating in the Bureau of Prison's residential drug treatment program and receiving time credits towards his sentence. His motion is denied because it is not the proper subject of a motion under 28 U.S.C. section 2255, it is untimely, and it is barred by his plea agreement. See, e.g., Tribble v. United States, No. 3:16-CV-10029, 2018 WL 5116540, at *3-5 (S.D. W. Va. Sept. 25, 2018) (proposed findings and recommendations). Further, it does not warrant relief under Rule 60(b)(6). See also Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(f) (establishing procedures to object to information contained in the PSR).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer