Jackson v. Tansy, 2:18CV00151-JM. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20190716879
Visitors: 27
Filed: Jul. 15, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 15, 2019
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, JR. , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Defendant Tansy's Motion for Summary Judg
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, JR. , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Defendant Tansy's Motion for Summary Judgm..
More
ORDER
JAMES M. MOODY, JR., District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
1. Defendant Tansy's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 19) is GRANTED.
2. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Tansy are DISMISSED without prejudice.
3. This case is DISMISSED.
4. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from an Order adopting these recommendations and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith.
Source: Leagle
