Matar v. Kelley, 5:18-cv-262-DPM. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20190725807
Visitors: 17
Filed: Jul. 24, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 24, 2019
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, JR. , District Judge . On de novo review, the Court adopts the recommendation, No. 19, as corrected and overrules Matar's objections, No. 20. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). The correction: the recommendation's final paragraph should refer to Matar, not Russell. No. 19 at 10. Matar's petition is untimely; and he hasn't cleared equitable tolling's high bar. His petition will therefore be dismissed with prejudice. No certificate of appealability will issue. 28 U.S.C.
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, JR. , District Judge . On de novo review, the Court adopts the recommendation, No. 19, as corrected and overrules Matar's objections, No. 20. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). The correction: the recommendation's final paragraph should refer to Matar, not Russell. No. 19 at 10. Matar's petition is untimely; and he hasn't cleared equitable tolling's high bar. His petition will therefore be dismissed with prejudice. No certificate of appealability will issue. 28 U.S.C. 2..
More
ORDER
D.P. MARSHALL, JR., District Judge.
On de novo review, the Court adopts the recommendation, No. 19, as corrected and overrules Matar's objections, No. 20. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). The correction: the recommendation's final paragraph should refer to Matar, not Russell. No. 19 at 10. Matar's petition is untimely; and he hasn't cleared equitable tolling's high bar. His petition will therefore be dismissed with prejudice. No certificate of appealability will issue. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)-(2).
So Ordered.
Source: Leagle
