Paxton v. Gray, 5:18CV00032-JLH-JTR. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20190730940
Visitors: 27
Filed: Jul. 29, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 29, 2019
Summary: ORDER J. LEON HOLMES , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Recommendation submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray. No objections have been filed. After careful review, the Recommendation is approved and adopted in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendant's motion for summary judgment (Document #20) is granted, and Barry Paxton's complaint and amended complaint are dismissed, in their entirety, without prej
Summary: ORDER J. LEON HOLMES , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Recommendation submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray. No objections have been filed. After careful review, the Recommendation is approved and adopted in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendant's motion for summary judgment (Document #20) is granted, and Barry Paxton's complaint and amended complaint are dismissed, in their entirety, without preju..
More
ORDER
J. LEON HOLMES, District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Recommendation submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray. No objections have been filed. After careful review, the Recommendation is approved and adopted in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1. Defendant's motion for summary judgment (Document #20) is granted, and Barry Paxton's complaint and amended complaint are dismissed, in their entirety, without prejudice.
2. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith.
Source: Leagle
