Filed: Nov. 15, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 15, 2019
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, JR. , District Judge . Pointing to the need to arrive early, work through lunch, stay late, and MedPartners's timesheet policy, No. 40 at 2-4, No. 39 at 9, No. 39-3, Rainey says she worked more than forty hours a week as a Nurse Practitioner, but MedPartners didn't pay her enough overtime. Pointing to Rainey's signed timesheets, patient logs, and paid lunch break policy, No. 33-1, No. 33-2, No. 33-3, No. 40 at 2-4, MedPartners responds that Rainey never worked overt
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, JR. , District Judge . Pointing to the need to arrive early, work through lunch, stay late, and MedPartners's timesheet policy, No. 40 at 2-4, No. 39 at 9, No. 39-3, Rainey says she worked more than forty hours a week as a Nurse Practitioner, but MedPartners didn't pay her enough overtime. Pointing to Rainey's signed timesheets, patient logs, and paid lunch break policy, No. 33-1, No. 33-2, No. 33-3, No. 40 at 2-4, MedPartners responds that Rainey never worked overti..
More
ORDER
D.P. MARSHALL, JR., District Judge.
Pointing to the need to arrive early, work through lunch, stay late, and MedPartners's timesheet policy, No. 40 at 2-4, No. 39 at 9, No. 39-3, Rainey says she worked more than forty hours a week as a Nurse Practitioner, but MedPartners didn't pay her enough overtime. Pointing to Rainey's signed timesheets, patient logs, and paid lunch break policy, No. 33-1, No. 33-2, No. 33-3, No. 40 at 2-4, MedPartners responds that Rainey never worked overtime. There's no way to resolve the genuinely disputed material facts short of a trial. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 250-51 (1986). We'll have one as scheduled on 10 February 2020. MedPartners's motion for summary judgment, No. 33, is denied.
So Ordered.
