Jones v. Emberton, 4:19-CV-227-BSM-BD. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20191127b51
Visitors: 32
Filed: Nov. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 26, 2019
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER , District Judge . After careful review, United States Magistrate Judge Beth Deere's findings and partial recommendation [Doc. No. 27] are adopted, and Lucas Emberton's motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 21] is granted as to Jesse Jones's claims that he was denied access to religious personnel, newspapers, and television, and that court date extensions were misused. These claims are dismissed without prejudice. Emberton's motion for summary judgment is denied as to
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER , District Judge . After careful review, United States Magistrate Judge Beth Deere's findings and partial recommendation [Doc. No. 27] are adopted, and Lucas Emberton's motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 21] is granted as to Jesse Jones's claims that he was denied access to religious personnel, newspapers, and television, and that court date extensions were misused. These claims are dismissed without prejudice. Emberton's motion for summary judgment is denied as to ..
More
ORDER
BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge.
After careful review, United States Magistrate Judge Beth Deere's findings and partial recommendation [Doc. No. 27] are adopted, and Lucas Emberton's motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 21] is granted as to Jesse Jones's claims that he was denied access to religious personnel, newspapers, and television, and that court date extensions were misused. These claims are dismissed without prejudice. Emberton's motion for summary judgment is denied as to Jones's claim that he was denied visitation.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
