Carter v. BPL Plasma Inc., 3:19-CV-174-DPM-BD. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20191206993
Visitors: 3
Filed: Dec. 05, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 05, 2019
Summary: ORDER BETH DEERE , Magistrate Judge . On November 15, 2019, this Court denied Plaintiff Andre Carter's pro se motion for the appointment of counsel. (Docket entry #26). Mr. Carter now has filed a notice with the Court in which he again explains his need for counsel. (#27) The notice will be treated as a motion for reconsideration. The Court is sympathetic to Mr. Carter's request; however, there is no right to appointed counsel in a civil case such as this. Mr. Carter appears able to rep
Summary: ORDER BETH DEERE , Magistrate Judge . On November 15, 2019, this Court denied Plaintiff Andre Carter's pro se motion for the appointment of counsel. (Docket entry #26). Mr. Carter now has filed a notice with the Court in which he again explains his need for counsel. (#27) The notice will be treated as a motion for reconsideration. The Court is sympathetic to Mr. Carter's request; however, there is no right to appointed counsel in a civil case such as this. Mr. Carter appears able to repr..
More
ORDER
BETH DEERE, Magistrate Judge.
On November 15, 2019, this Court denied Plaintiff Andre Carter's pro se motion for the appointment of counsel. (Docket entry #26). Mr. Carter now has filed a notice with the Court in which he again explains his need for counsel. (#27) The notice will be treated as a motion for reconsideration.
The Court is sympathetic to Mr. Carter's request; however, there is no right to appointed counsel in a civil case such as this. Mr. Carter appears able to represent himself for the present.
The motion for reconsideration (#27) is DENIED, without prejudice, this 5th day of December, 2019.
Source: Leagle
