Wilson v. Payne, 5:19-CV-00134-BRW-JTR. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20191210939
Visitors: 33
Filed: Dec. 09, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 09, 2019
Summary: ORDER BILLY ROY WILSON , District Judge . I have reviewed the Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray (Doc. No. 22) and the filed objections (Doc. No. 23. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record in this case, I approve and adopt the Recommended Disposition in all respects. Judgment will be entered accordingly. Accordingly, the Petition and Amended Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C.
Summary: ORDER BILLY ROY WILSON , District Judge . I have reviewed the Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray (Doc. No. 22) and the filed objections (Doc. No. 23. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record in this case, I approve and adopt the Recommended Disposition in all respects. Judgment will be entered accordingly. Accordingly, the Petition and Amended Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. ..
More
ORDER
BILLY ROY WILSON, District Judge.
I have reviewed the Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray (Doc. No. 22) and the filed objections (Doc. No. 23. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record in this case, I approve and adopt the Recommended Disposition in all respects. Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Accordingly, the Petition and Amended Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. No. 1, 3) are DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
A Certificate of Appealability is DENIED. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle