KENNETH S. HIXSON, Judge.
Appellant Gary Steve Lloyd was seriously and perrnanently injured as the result of a fall from a second floor common-area balcony of a condominium building located at 100 Bayou Point in Hot Springs, Arkansas. The properry is known as Pier'W'est Condominiums. Lloyd appeals the entry of summary judgment against him and in favor of appellee Pier West Property Owners Association ("Pier West") regarding his lawsuit allegrng negligence in the installation and maintenance of the wooden balcony railing.
We cannot reach the merits of Lloyd's appeal due to deficiencies in the record and addendum. Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-2(a)(8)(A)(i) (2014) requires that the addendum to an appellant's brief include the pleadings on which the circuit court decided each issue, specifically identifring the complaint and answer. Rule 4-2(a)(8)(A)(i) further provides that if any pleading is amended, then the final version and any earlier version incorporated therein must be included in the addendum. A review oflloyd's brief reveals that he failed to include his second amended complaint, his third amended complaint, and Pier'West's answer to the third amended complaint. These pleadings were filed prior to the entry ofsummaryjudgment on Pier'W'est's behalf and are necessary for us to consider this appeal. In addition, we note that two pages of the second amended complaint are omitted from the record, as well as one page ofthe third amended complaint. Ifanything material to either parry is omitted from the record, we may direct that a supplemenal record be certified and transmitted. Ark. R. App. P.-Civ. 6(e) (201a). Lloyd has thirry days to file the supplemental record with our clerk's office. Pursuant to Rule 4-2(b)(4), we order Lloyd to 6le a supplemental addendum within seven calendar days ofthe supplemental record being filed to provide the additional materials from the record to the members ofthe appellate court. The materials listed herein are not to be taken as an exhaustive list of deficiencies; appellant should carefully review the rules to ensure that no other deficiencies exist. See Smith u. Lovelace, 2014 Ark.App. 187.
Supplemental record and addendum ordered.
Kwanp and GrovsR, JJ., agree.