Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

AIKENS v. HELDER, 10-5028. (2012)

Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas Number: infdco20120207787 Visitors: 6
Filed: Feb. 06, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 06, 2012
Summary: ORDER JIMM LARRY HENDREN, District Judge. Now on this 6th day of February, 2012, comes on for consideration the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 21), to which no objections have been filed. The Court, being well and sufficiently advised, finds that the Report and Recommendation is sound in all respects and should be adopted in toto. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 21) is hereby adopted in toto. IT I
More

ORDER

JIMM LARRY HENDREN, District Judge.

Now on this 6th day of February, 2012, comes on for consideration the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 21), to which no objections have been filed. The Court, being well and sufficiently advised, finds that the Report and Recommendation is sound in all respects and should be adopted in toto.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 21) is hereby adopted in toto.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 21), the plaintiff's complaint is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute this action and to comply with orders of the Court pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer