DUREN v. TURNER, 4:10-cv-4123. (2012)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20120302905
Visitors: 4
Filed: Mar. 01, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 01, 2012
Summary: ORDER SUSAN O. HICKEY, District Judge. Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed February 9, 2012 by the Honorable James R. Marschewski, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (ECF No. 43). Judge Marschewski recommends that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 36) be denied. The parties have not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to object has passed. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). Therefore, the Court adopts t
Summary: ORDER SUSAN O. HICKEY, District Judge. Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed February 9, 2012 by the Honorable James R. Marschewski, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (ECF No. 43). Judge Marschewski recommends that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 36) be denied. The parties have not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to object has passed. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). Therefore, the Court adopts th..
More
ORDER
SUSAN O. HICKEY, District Judge.
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed February 9, 2012 by the Honorable James R. Marschewski, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (ECF No. 43). Judge Marschewski recommends that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 36) be denied. The parties have not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to object has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in toto. Accordingly, Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 36) should be and hereby is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
