CHESTER ARCH REALTY, LLC v. K MART CORPORATION, 2:11-CV-02212. (2012)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20120523996
Visitors: 7
Filed: Mar. 22, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 22, 2012
Summary: ORDER P.K. HOLMES, III, Chief District Judge. Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint (Doc. 18). No objections have been entered in opposition to the Motion, and the response period has passed. Accordingly, the Court finds the Motion should be and hereby is GRANTED. Plaintiff is directed to file the Amended Complaint, attached as Exhibit 1 to its Motion, and accompanying exhibits. Because Plaintiff's Amended Complaint appears to cure the deficiencies allege
Summary: ORDER P.K. HOLMES, III, Chief District Judge. Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint (Doc. 18). No objections have been entered in opposition to the Motion, and the response period has passed. Accordingly, the Court finds the Motion should be and hereby is GRANTED. Plaintiff is directed to file the Amended Complaint, attached as Exhibit 1 to its Motion, and accompanying exhibits. Because Plaintiff's Amended Complaint appears to cure the deficiencies alleged..
More
ORDER
P.K. HOLMES, III, Chief District Judge.
Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint (Doc. 18). No objections have been entered in opposition to the Motion, and the response period has passed. Accordingly, the Court finds the Motion should be and hereby is GRANTED. Plaintiff is directed to file the Amended Complaint, attached as Exhibit 1 to its Motion, and accompanying exhibits.
Because Plaintiff's Amended Complaint appears to cure the deficiencies alleged in Defendant's previously-filed Motion to Dismiss, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED AS MOOT.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
