Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

GEUSS v. ASTRUE, 10-5244. (2012)

Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas Number: infdco20120523999 Visitors: 17
Filed: May 22, 2012
Latest Update: May 22, 2012
Summary: ORDER JIMM LARRY HENDREN, District Judge. Now on this 22nd day of May, 2012, comes on for consideration the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 14), to which no objections have been filed. The Court, being well and sufficiently advised, finds that the Report and Recommendation is sound in all respects and should be adopted in toto. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 14) is hereby adopted in toto. IT IS FURTHER ORDER
More

ORDER

JIMM LARRY HENDREN, District Judge.

Now on this 22nd day of May, 2012, comes on for consideration the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 14), to which no objections have been filed. The Court, being well and sufficiently advised, finds that the Report and Recommendation is sound in all respects and should be adopted in toto.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 14) is hereby adopted in toto.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 14), the ALJ's decision is REVERSED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is hereby remanded to the Commissioner for further consideration pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer