MILLER v. DUGAN, 2:11-CV-02129. (2012)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20120525828
Visitors: 11
Filed: May 24, 2012
Latest Update: May 24, 2012
Summary: ORDER P.K. HOLMES, III, Chief District Judge. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Attendance at Depositions (Doc. 13) and Defendants' Response (Doc. 14). Plaintiff seeks an order compelling the Defendants to present for depositions on May 29, 2012. It appearing to the Court that the parties did not finally and mutually agree to hold Defendants' depositions on May 29, or any other specific date, the Court finds that Plaintiff's Motion (Doc. 13) should be and hereby is D
Summary: ORDER P.K. HOLMES, III, Chief District Judge. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Attendance at Depositions (Doc. 13) and Defendants' Response (Doc. 14). Plaintiff seeks an order compelling the Defendants to present for depositions on May 29, 2012. It appearing to the Court that the parties did not finally and mutually agree to hold Defendants' depositions on May 29, or any other specific date, the Court finds that Plaintiff's Motion (Doc. 13) should be and hereby is DE..
More
ORDER
P.K. HOLMES, III, Chief District Judge.
Currently before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Attendance at Depositions (Doc. 13) and Defendants' Response (Doc. 14). Plaintiff seeks an order compelling the Defendants to present for depositions on May 29, 2012.
It appearing to the Court that the parties did not finally and mutually agree to hold Defendants' depositions on May 29, or any other specific date, the Court finds that Plaintiff's Motion (Doc. 13) should be and hereby is DENIED. The Court declines to compel either party to attend a deposition on any specific date at this time.
Also pending before the Court is Defendants' recently-filed Motion to Compel. (Doc. 15). Given the proximity of the discovery deadline,1 and in the interest of resolving the issues presented in a timely manner, Plaintiff is DIRECTED to file any Response to Defendants' Motion on or before May 31, 2012.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. A Final Scheduling Order (Doc. 9) has been entered in this case, setting a discovery deadline of July 7, 2012. The parties are reminded that, pursuant to that Order, the Court generally will not a grant a continuance because a party does not have time in which to depose a witness.
Source: Leagle
